Monthly Archive for February, 2010

Prams On eBay: Buyer Beware

Becoming an educated eBay buyer is a skill that requires some cultivation:  There’s really no substitute for experience.  The same holds for using Craigslist or shopping at second-hand shops and garage sales.  If you’re buying vintage prams or strollers here are a few tips to give you a jump-start.

First, read listings skeptically.  The phrases “in good condition for its age” doesn’t mean anything unless you know the seller and trust his/her evaluation.  I once saw this term applied to a rusted, broken chassis, which wouldn’t have been in good condition even if it had dated from ancient Rome.

Descriptions in general should be regarded as suspect; they’re very often inaccurate or downright wrong.  If in doubt ask and be specific:  Is the fabric torn?  Is there any rust?  Is the tire rubber damaged?

For example, here’s a description of an Emmaljunga carrycot pram on offer as I write this post:

This is a One-of-a-kind, no longer offered in stores, Classic Emmaljunga Stroller Pram. These strollers are not mass produced.  However, Emmaljunga  sells parts to complete the pram.

The seller’s headline calls this carriage “vintage” and “rare”.  It’s not at all rare; they crop up quite frequently on eBay and elsewhere. It’s not  remotely  “one-of-a-kind”.  And it is probably from the 1980s, which doesn’t even make it properly vintage.

If I wanted to be really picky, I’d point out that this particular model is NOT either a “classic” Emmaljunga stroller OR a pram; it’s a carrycot on a transporter chassis.  It can be called a pram (I did above), but it’s not a classic pram by a long shot.  A classic pram is larger, and would have a steel body (or a wood one, if it were much older and truly vintage).

The seller claims the frame material is aluminum; it’s actually chromed steel.

The statement “these strollers are not mass produced” is TWO outright lies.  First, it’s not a stroller, and secondly, it most definitely WAS mass-produced. In a factory, by machines.  To claim otherwise is just bizarre, as just about anyone can tell simply by looking at it.  Stroller seats were available for these frames, but this seller is not offering one, which makes this description all the more misleading, as this is a carrycot bed, and no kind of stroller.

Further, the statement that “Emmaljunga sells parts to complete the pram” is misleading and irrelevant:  Emmaljunga no longer sells anything in the USA, and no longer sells this model anywhere.  If this carriage actually needs parts, it won’t be possible to get them, period.  This seller, like many, has just written whatever he/she felt like writing — and what he/she thought would sell the item.

The seller also believes that Emmaljunga’s address (“28022 vittsjo”) is a model number.  That would be wrong; it’s the city in Sweden where Emmaljunga is located.

And the seller’s “Buy It Now” price of $300?  It’s ridiculous; just a few weeks ago this very model, with accessories this seller doesn’t have, without the interior tear, sold on eBay for under $30.00.

Keep this example in mind as you read on; it’s illustrative.

Don’t trust any eBay seller’s dating of a pram or a stroller, unless they have a nearly perfect positive rating, and some specific information to back up his/her claim.  In my experience, eBay sellers are wrong about the dates for vintage strollers and prams roughly 95% of the time.  The other 5% are clear about not knowing dates (“I think this is from 1950, but I don’t really know”) or can back up their date claim.  (“I bought this stroller in 1970 for my first child.”)

The word “leather” in virtually any pram or stroller listing is wrong.  Dead wrong.  Emmaljunga strollers are frequently described as being made of leather, as are older US baby carriages.  They’re not;  they’re made of vinyl or leather-like vinyl or “leatherette” material.

Production post-WWII strollers and carriages were not made of leather, almost without exception (one exception, though, is noted below).  Nor were pre-WWII strollers made of leather, as a rule, although there may be a very few exceptions from early in the 20th century.  Those would be true antiques, and if you’re going to buy anything that old, or potentially valuable, it would be best to ascertain that the description is perfectly accurate in every particular before parting with your cold, hard cash.

Maclaren does offer an leather-seated umbrella-style stroller, but it’s modern and was originally sold (may still be sold) for around $1,000.00.  If you think you’re buying that particular stroller, verify it.  Otherwise, the use of the word “leather” is a sure give-away that the seller is exaggerating or mis-representing his/her goods.

Be suspicious of the words “vintage” and “antique”. In general, a “vintage” pram would be one that was made post-WWII, and an “antique” would be pre-WWII.  Sellers use these terms indiscriminately, and sometimes even describe contemporary strollers or prams using these terms.  Don’t assume they are correct.

Watch out for hyperbole in descriptions. “The Cadillac of baby carriages” is a meaningless phrase, meant to excite a potential buyer.  In my experience, this kind of writing is used by sellers instead of meaningful descriptions of condition or age.  Watch out for this; don’t let the seller distract you by evoking an emotional response that has nothing to do with what’s being sold.

Be very wary of any seller’s claims that a stroller or pram is worth any specific amount. These claims will almost always be inaccurate.  Unless you can verify them, don’t believe a seller who says that a pram or stroller “sells” for XXX dollars; the claim will almost always be wrong.

For example, this current eBay listing is offering a used “Silver Cross Kensington pram” with a corduroy-like body for nearly three times what it cost, brand-new, in 1985!

A quick look at “completed” auctions on eBay will demonstrate exactly how deluded is the “buy it now” price of $975.00. Not to mention that you could buy a brand-new Inglesina Classica, instead, for $275.00 less than this seller wants for this lower-end, 25-year-old used carriage.

Another Internet search will reveal that the the seller’s claim that the current Kensington model sells for $1,995.00 is completely irrelevant to this sale.  That’s because the $1,995.00 model is a completely different type of pram.  Here’s the cheaper, used, cloth version:

And here’s the classic, $2,000.00 version, which features a steel body, a larger, more elaborate chassis, a fitted basket, and elegant dual-sized tires (every bit of it brand-new):

Comparing the two is like comparing persimmons and turnips.  There’s nothing wrong with a turnip, but it’s definitely NOT a persimmon.  Even when the cord Silver Cross was new, it wasn’t on the same luxury tier as the steel-bodied prams.

Further, this seller lifted his/her detailed description from a current website (you can view it here at the Silver Cross America website), and, of course, what he/she then posted on eBay has nothing to do with the pram first sold in 1985.  The sizes and weight are not accurate for the model the seller has listed; the seller’s model does not have a “steel body”; the entire description only applies to the 2010 Kensington, not to the eBay listing.

(For a thorough look at the value of used/old/vintage strollers and prams,and a much more realistic idea of what this seller could expect to get for a used pram,  see What Is My Stroller/Pram/Baby Carriage Worth?)

Make sure that you know what you are buying. This current listing is for a doll stroller:

The seller mentions dolls, and mentions that the stroller is in “played with” condition  (which, in this case, includes “rust”, “some stains” and “some wear”) but does not make it clear that this is not a full-size double stroller.  The listing header does not say “Double Doll Stroller”.  (We own this doll stroller, and paid $24.00 for it, brand-new, in 1988.)  That $75.00 “buy it now” price might lead a customer to assume that this is full-sized baby transport.   It would be quite unusual for a modern doll stroller of this size and type to sell for this much.

At any given time there are always a number of listing for doll carriages that sellers describe as being baby carriages — some of these are innocent mistakes or just carelessness, but some are clearly dishonest.  Make sure you know what you’re bidding on.  If the actual dimensions of the item aren’t included, and you aren’t certain you know the size, email the seller to find out for sure.

There’s no reason not to buy a used, older, or vintage pram, but it’s to your advantage to keep your wits about you when shopping.  And sellers?  You’ve got a much better chance of selling your goods if you, too, know  what you’re doing — and are smart, accurate, and honest about it.

Spotted In Video: Steelcraft Strider 4

(Or is it?  See the update.)

Sacha Baron Cohen’s Brüno is a pretty awful film.  I don’t think it’s obscene, exactly, but it’s definitely crude and completely juvenile — and not in any good way.  The Guardian pretty much got it; the header on their review says that the movie is “is a product of Sacha Baron Cohen’s bourgeois sexual neuroses”.  (Class war!) (The review itself is quite graphic:  You’re forewarned.)  I’m afraid the reviewer makes a good case for his thesis; Baron Cohen is bright enough and witty enough to actually be funny sometimes, but this wasn’t one of them.

However, that’s not why we’re here.  Sex and neurosis aside, there’s a pram in Brüno:

brü-bdy-400The laptop’s an add-on, and so is the optional gold lamé diaper bag (which matches fashionista Brüno’s shoes, visible in the background).

Intrepid researcher that I am, it still took a bit of serious snooping to scope out the model:

stri-by-300It’s an Australian Steelcraft Strider 4 that’s been heavily, and interestingly, modded.  This image, the one that demonstrates the genealogy best, is from eBay Australia.  The film was a bust, but the pram modifications are quite clever; more about them later.

(Note, 3/13/2010:  As hinted above, this may actually be an UPPABaby Vista.  Details here.  It’s a sad day for stroller forensics.)

Spotted In The Wild: Buzz

San Francisco, Bush Street.  Quinny Buzz 3 in Capri:

San Francisco:  More Quinnys per square mile than anywhere — and most of those the marvelous Buzz.  Are they really all over the place, or does it just seem so?  I admit that, to my mind, a Buzz seems far better suited to life on San Francisco’s  hills than the rather more stodgy, and bulkier, Bugaboo.  But perhaps that’s not all there is to it  .  .  .

A Bugaboo is an easy choice; a follower’s choice, if you will.  A Buzz, on the other hand,  is quirkier, better suited for those who are perhaps more inclined to think for themselves.  More like, say, San Franciscans, than Manhattanites.  You know it’s true:  A Bugaboo in Manhattan is just a cliché.  A Buzz in San Francisco melds creative engineering and romance, and it just doesn’t get better than that.

Mountain Climbing, Kinderwagen Style

Wanderbabys (“Walking Baby”) is for those amongst us who read German:

wndr-bbys-300

These Europeans do not kid around when out and about mit dem Kinderwagen.  This one offers 51 walks (hikes? endurance trips?) in the South Tyrol region of Germany.  Includes aerial photography.  (Which is necessary why?  See “endurance” reference  above.)

Amazon’s description reads, in part:

Dieses Buch ist ein Buch für frischgebackene Eltern und Familien mit Kleinkindern, die auch mit ihren Kindern die Schönheiten der Südtiroler Bergwelt erleben möchten. Das Buch bietet 51 Wandervorschläge speziell für Unternehmungen mit dem Kinderwagen.

Routes range from easy to arduous.  Don’t bring the MacLaren; you need a tank for this trip.  Think Teutonia.

Previously:  For Fans of Mr. Wordsworth

Spotted In The Wild: Buzz

San Francisco.  Quinny Buzz. Union Square:

In theory, you shouldn’t be able to hang this quantity of baggage off a stroller handle, but apparently it works just fine with a Buzz — at least as long as there’s a kid counterweight.  I confess to loving this profile (more so without the bags), but it’s smarter to buy a Buzz 4 now that they’re available.  Virtually the same profile, but greater stability.

Whoo-Whoo, Baby

Nothing frosts my cookies more than some dimbulb on eBay claiming that whatever he (or she, let’s be fair here) is selling is “the Cadillac of strollers”.  No, it isn’t.  If you even think of using that phrase, what you’re selling isn’t.  Trust  me; you don’t know what you’re talking about.

On the other hand, if you’re the owner of this baby, you have my blessing.  In spades:

cd-clp

Sweet, non?  And they say Detroit’s dead.

SourceQueensland Region Cadillac LaSalle Club

Spotted In The Wild: Chicco

San Francisco.  Japantown.  Chicco CtO.6:

sf-ct-300Found everywhere.  Sufficiently ubiquitous to abandon, apparently with no fear of theft.

Yeah, I know, another one.   Japantown was notable, though, on several visits, for the generally higher quality of strollers out and about than are usually found elsewhere.  This one’s a really good choice – probably the best choice – at the low end of the price spectrum, even if it doesn’t make my heart sing like a Buzz, an UppaBaby or a Mutsy.

It’s “key-ko” by the way, not “chico”.  But your little chico can have a nice ride in it.

Edited 2/28/2010 to replace accidentally lost text.

Activism, Pram-Style

Abandoned prams worry us here at Pram Watch, so you can imagine our concern when images like the one below came to our attention.  However, no prams were hurt during the experiment, and babies may have been helped, in the cosmic sense.  So we’re totally on board, after all.  This is a picture of people responding (and not) to the wails of a crying baby, which are emanating from the blue pram:

ucf-fin

Only there’s no baby.  That pram is “UNICEF blue”, and inside is a sound system, hollering away.  It’s an campaign, apparently from last winter (March 2009) ,  meant to raise awareness, in Finland, of UNICEF’s commitment to children.  Concerned passersby who peeked into the unattended prams (there apparently were 15 of them, scattered across the country) saw a note:  ““By supporting UNICEF anyone can be a mother to them, for just a moment” (or something like that — I’m in no position to parse Finnish).

Interesting experiment, no?  Apparently no one tracked bystander involvement, because that wasn’t the point, but at least one blog reported (yeah, this is all hearsay, since, as noted above, I can’t read Finnish) that

Media and public reaction was overwhelming. They flooded all the major TV, radio and web news. Estimated media reach was over 80% of Finnish population after 2 days.

80% of the population?!  Those are better-than-super-bowl numbers!   Would it work in the USA?  I think not.   I’m guessing that Finns are more likely to check on crying infants who have apparently been abandoned in the snow.  I’m thinking it’s a smaller, friendlier place.  And a colder one.

See the movie!

Read a slightly snarky take here. Everybody’s a critic.

What’s It Worth? Part 2

I  discussed pram valuation in a previous post.  Here are a few completed listings from eBay as example of issues mentioned in that article.  All of these listings are for post-WWII items (with the possible, but unlikely, exception of the Pedigree, which I haven’t specifically tracked down); partly because that’s my focus area, but also because wicker carriages, and pre-WWII baby carriages, are another story.  Those are often bought, sold, and displayed as decorations.

In contrast, post-WWII buggies are generally bought as “nostalgia” items by people who remember them from childhood, or because the intention is to use them as quaint transportation for a modern baby, which means that they appeal to a different market.

These are all of the relevant completed listings.  All were pulled on a single, recent, day.  All prices are in USD (US dollars).

Did sell, Danish Odder pram, for $49, plus $85-100 shipping (but note that the buyer may have made private arrangements to pick-up):

odd-400

Did sell, Emmaljunga, modern-style, with carriage body, basket, and seat, $27  (shipping $80, but may have been picked up locally):

em-mod-seat-400

Did sell, Emmaljunga, portabed style,no seat attachment, $85.50, shipping $75:

emm-bed-200

Note that these last two models are similar, but that the one without the basket, and without the stroller seat, actually sold for more than three times as much as the one with the additional pieces; this is a perfect example of how much a seller is dependent on finding the right buyer, and an idea of how capricious the market can be.  (In addition, the seller of the more expensive pram noted that it had a rather serious rip along the top edge.)

Did sell, Silver Cross, 1980s, $59.99, shipping $133.47, but may have been picked up locally.  (The carriage bed is on backwards; that usually is no help in selling a pram, as the profile isn’t the one that makes most people go “ahhhhh”):

sc-80s-200

Did sell, Marmet modern blue, $125, local pick up:

mar-mod-400

Did not sell, Hedstrom stroller, $9.98, local pick up:

hed-st-by-400

Did not sell, Hedstrom lightweight collapsible, 1950s, $74.99, $49.99 shipping.  These older, cheaper-style models are generally difficult to sell, though they had an important place in lower and middle class US homes (and in US pram history):

hds-50s

Did not sell, Stroll-O-Chair, $75 local pick-up, the seller says that he/she paid $200 at antique store:

stro-dp-400

Did not sell, Silver Cross Kensington, starting bid $124.95, or buy immediately at $149.95, local pick up:

sc-ken-400

Did not sell, Pedigree, 1940s, $250, gorgeous, the buyer claimed it was made in France (but that’s wrong; it’s English), local pick up:

pstl-ped-400

Did not sell, Inglesina,  $400, shipping $40 (color is not a popular one in the US, the busy, and alarming,  background probably didn’t lend the air of “class” that could have helped  this one appeal to a buyer):

ing-beg-300

Did not sell, Gendron stroller, pram combination, $50 USD, shipping $100 (in BC, Canada, offered on US eBay, price is USD).  This is another one with the bed put on backwards:

gen-400

Did not sell,  $80, local pick-up:

delx-wht-400

Did not sell, Perego, 1979, reserve not met at $278.80, shipping $24.08.  A particularly elegant chassis with 14 inch and 18 inch wheels.  This modern wicker version is usually easier-to-sell than most, but not, apparently, at a high reserve.)  The seller says he/she paid $500 for it when new, from Saks (which would have been just about right):

79-pg-wkr-sks-300

Did not sell, incorrectly listed as a 1950s model (it’s newer), but vintage, $175 plus $135 shipping:

dia-400

Did not sell, vintage Perego, $301, shipping $50, carriage configuration:

peg-comb1-400

Same listing, stroller configuration (this model comes as a combination):

peg-comb-2-300

This is one of the Perego combinations I refer to above as sometimes selling in the higher price range.  Although this set is beautiful, it didn’t sell.  Go figure (but I’d say the price was too high).  It does appear to be missing the pram apron and the accessory boot for the stroller, but most buyers wouldn’t notice (or, perhaps, care).

Did not sell, 1961 Marmet, $400 local pick up:

mar61-300

Did not sell at $179, a 1973 Babyhood Wonda-Chair, local pickup  (and a favorite USA nostalgia item).  $700 in 1973:

wnda-400

This sale included all the available pieces to the full set (ie, many different parts for a large number of configurations), except the optional car seat.  The original booklet was also included.  These sets (Babyhood, Stroll-O-Chair) are amazing, but virtually impossible to give away, much less sell.  Still, it’s always worth trying, although Craigslist is a much better bet when there are so many heavy parts to consider.

Note that eBay sellers are notorious (at least in my mind) for inaccurate listings.  A number of items I surveyed on this particular day were incorrectly described as “baby carriages”, when, in fact, they were “doll carriages”.  Those weren’t included in this selection; doll buggies are a rather different market than full-sized baby carriages or strollers. Stated ages were often wrong; and, despite seller claims, none of these buggies are “leather”.  But that’s a post for another day.

The last paragraph of my previous post bears repeating:

Strollers, whether a $1,000 Orbit, a Stokke or whatever, are not an investment.  They are transportation.  Nor is that vintage pram you  covet an investment.  If you love it, buy it and hope you can sell it if you need to, or want to, but don’t expect it to appreciate in value;  that’s extremely unlikely to happen.

Even your trendy Bugaboo only has value as long as a market exists; if it hasn’t been beaten up too much in use; if there aren’t a huge number of similar used ones available; and if there are people with disposable income who want to buy one.  And even then, you won’t set the price; the market will.  And it won’t be nearly what you paid for it new, almost certainly.

Spotted In The Wild: Vista

San Francisco:  Japantown.  UPPABaby Vista:

sf-upv-jtn-300

With plastic baby carrier.  I’m not sure what the demographics actually are, but San Francisco seems to abound with UPPABabys pushed by guys in low, baggy pants as opposed to the more typical suburban-appearing moms.

I’m not sure that those guys would have been pushing any baby stroller five years ago, much less a higher-end designer-type.  Is it revolutionary?  Is it social commentary (like rappers adopting Gucci and Chanel to turn the luxury establishment on its head)?  Is it an appreciation of a good ride?

Maybe somebody just had a fire sale in an unexpected neighborhood.  I love it; I’m all for good strollers for everybody.  A decent buggy means more and happier walkies for everyone, baby included.

(You can see — barely — that a mom was, in fact, pushing this particular Vista at the time I snapped this shot, but the guys had been walking it earlier; my observation still stands.)